Here's what Mark Zuckerberg had to say about the Apple Vision Pro

Earlier today, some employees attended the meeting in person and video streamed the meeting to others. The stream appears to have been leaked to The Verge's Alex Heath, who said he watched the meeting and transcribed it.

扎克伯格声称“好消息”是苹果对 AR/VR 硬件设计问题“没有任何神奇的解决方案” Meta的工程师和研究人员“还没有探索和想到”。

他承认 Apple Vision Pro 具有更高的分辨率和“他们投入其中的所有技术”，但指出了这种力量的权衡：需要系留电池和价格是 Apple Vision Pro 的七倍 Meta最近宣布 Quest 3.

Zuckerberg goes on to suggest there's a 'real philosophical difference'" Between Apple's vision for AR/VR and his. He claims that Meta wants to offer a "basic social" headset at a price most people can afford, focusing on "actively doing things," while Apple promotes "a person sitting alone on the couch." He acknowledged that Apple's approach "could be the vision for the future of computing," but said "it's not what I want."

"And we've sold tens of millions of Quests," he assured the Meta clerk.

Zuckerberg concluded by claiming that seeing the launch of the Apple Vision Pro made him "even more excited and in many ways optimistic that what we're doing is important and will be successful."

Here's his full review, according to Heath:

"Apple finally announced their headset, so I wanted to talk about that. I'm really curious to see what they'll be announcing. Obviously I haven't seen it yet, so I'll find out more when we get to play with it , to see what happens and how people use it.

From what I've seen initially, I'd say the good news is that they don't have any magic solutions to any of the constraints, laws, and physics that our team hasn't explored and thought of yet. They've got a higher resolution display, between that and all the tech they're powering it, it costs seven times as much, and it takes so much power now that now you need a battery and a the wire connected to it to use it. They made design tradeoffs that might make sense for the case they were dealing with.

But, I think their announcement really showcases the difference in values and vision that our company brings to this in a way that I think is very important. It's a core part of what we do that we're constantly innovating to make sure our products are as accessible and affordable as possible for everyone. We've sold tens of millions of Quests.

What's more, our vision of the metaverse and existence is fundamentally social. It's about people interacting in new ways and feeling closer in new ways. Our devices are also about being active and doing things. In contrast, every demo they show is a person sitting alone on a couch. I mean, this might be the vision of the future of computing, but it's like, that's not what I want. There are real philosophical differences in how we approach this issue. Seeing what they're launching there and how they're going to compete makes me even more excited and in many ways optimistic that what we're doing is important and will be successful. But it's going to be an interesting ride. "